ads

Slider[Style1]

Style2

Style3[OneLeft]

Style3[OneRight]

Style4

Style5


Jakarta - Putusan Mahkamah Agung (MA) yang menghukum Rasminah dengan hukuman 130 hari penjara karena dinilai mencuri 6 piring majikannya disayangkan banyak pihak. MA dinilai tidak bisa menegakkan keadilan, hanya peraturan semata.

"Untuk perkara-perkara kecil, dimana hati nurani MA? Ini batu ujian buat MA. Putusan ini tidak mencerminkan keadilan," kata pengamat hukum pidana Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Jawa Tengah, Hibnu Nugroho saat berbincang dengan detikcom, Selasa, (31/1/2012).

Secara yuridis, putusan ii juga melanggar hukum. Sebab, putusan bebas PN Tangerang tidak bisa diajukan ke kasasi. "Dalam KUHAP, putusan bebas tidak bisa diajukan kasasi. Ini kok oleh jaksa diajukan kasasi," sesal doktor bidang ilmu pidana ini.

Seharusnya, jaksa harus selektif mengajukan kasasi. Jaksa harus menghargai harkat dan martabat warga negara yang diputus bebas.

"Tidak bisa hanya berdasar yurisprudensi, lalu jaksa kasasi. Jaksa harus selektif memilih perkara maju seleksi. Ini masa cuma 6 piring, maju kasasi," tutur Hibnu.

Rasminah dituduh mencuri 6 piring pada Juni 2010 atas laporan majikannya, Siti Aisyah Soekarnoputri. Dia dituntut hukuman 5 bulan penjara oleh jaksa namun dibebaskan hakim PN Tangerang. Dia sempat ditahan selama 130 hari hingga penangguhan penahanannya dikabulkan. Oleh PN Tangerang, Rasminah diputus bebas. Ternyata, jaksa mengajukan kasasi ke MA.

Oleh MA, Rasminah dihukum 130 hari penjara pada 31 Mei 2011. Namun putusan kasasi tersebut terdapat beda pendapat. Yaitu ketua majelis hakim Artidjo Alkotsar, menyatakan Rasminah bebas. Suara Artidjo kalah suara dengan 2 anggota majelis hakim agung lainnya, Imam Harjadi dan Zaharuddin Utama.
sumber : detiknews.com

Jakarta - The Supreme Court (MA), which punishes Rasminah with penalties assessed 130 days in jail for stealing 6 plates employer's unfortunate many. MA judged not get justice, only the rules alone.

"For smaller matters, where conscience MA? These touchstone for MA. Decision does not reflect justice," the observer said General Sudirman University criminal law, Navan, Central Java, Nugroho Hibnu while talking to AFP, Tuesday (31 / 1/2012).

Legally, ii verdict against the law. Therefore, the Tangerang District Court acquittal can not be submitted to the Supreme Court. "In the Criminal Code, can not be filed acquittal appeal. This is why the prosecutor filed an appeal," regrets doctorate in criminal science.

Supposedly, the prosecutor filed an appeal to be selective. Prosecutors must respect the dignity of citizens acquitted.

"You can not just based jurisprudence, and prosecutors appeal. Prosecutors must selectively choose advanced case selection. This time only 6 plates, advanced appeal," said Hibnu.

Rasminah accused of stealing six plates in June 2010 over reports his employer, Siti Aisyah Soekarnoputri. He was sentenced to 5 months in prison but was released by prosecutors Tangerang district court judge. He was detained for 130 days until the suspension of arrest granted. By PN Tangerang, Rasminah acquitted. Apparently, the prosecutor filed an appeal to the Supreme Court.

By MA, Rasminah sentenced to 130 days in jail on May 31, 2011. But the decision is there difference of opinion. The head of the panel of judges Artidjo Alkotsar, stating Rasminah free. Sound Artidjo outvoted by two other members of the panel of judges, Imam and Zaharuddin Harjadi Main.
source: detiknews.com

About Step of Dream

This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.
«
Next
Posting Lebih Baru
»
Previous
Posting Lama

Find us on Facebook

THE HAPPENINGS

top sidebar ads


Top